Writings on Familias
Familias: Anatomy of a process, by Merián Soto
(click below for pdf)
Excerpts from:
Culture Gender, and Issues of Narrativity: Reading Texts in Antonio Gades’ Bodas de Sangre and Merián Soto’s Familias (1997)
by Sita Fredrick
-
James Adlesic’s dance is a sign and a a warning about the effects of cultural pressures to be a man, to be powerful and virile— the matador. But Soto’s choreography also resists stereotypes about poor, Latino men.
Soto’s choreography uses Christ imagery to associate this drunken man with wisdom, women, and God. Adlesic’s attempt to control his hands and to fly, suggest he wants to be cleansed of his faults, and transcend his body. There is something archetypally wise about a man who wants to escape the limitations of the body and see beyond the experience of suffering. His white underwear, the ethereal music, and his preoccupation with his hands and side, soften and reveal his body; moreover, he is associated with Jesus who is the wisest archetype in Christian symbolism. Towards the end of the dance, the three women remove their capes, revealing golden slips, and carry him, like the three Marys who removed Jesus from the cross, in a pieta position. Thus images of man as martyr, a drunk, and a prodigal son combine to represent a complex masculine identity.
Through the archetypal representations , Soto does an incredible service to warn her community about the crisis of masculine identity and addiction. At the same time her choreography resists stereotypes without ignoring an obvious problem and trend in many families… These archetypal visions of man illuminate the complexity of masculine identity and represent his vulnerability.
-
The history of colonization distinguishes the Latina’s experience as a woman from her European counterpart because rape and single motherhood form part of the Latin American woman’s recent past. Hence Soto’s portrayal of women as child bearers and caretakers who are at times subservient to men and even caught in supporting an addiction that perpetuates male dominance and abuse. Kathy Westwater’s solo invokes the strength and courage needed to struggle free from unhealthy relationships and prescribed roles. She is the heart of Familias and marks a beginning in Soto’s narrative that traces both the challenges and new ways of envisioning family and gender roles.
Soto creates compound archetypal female characters in her choreography; mother, daughter, angel, and warrior reveal the strength, resilience, spirituality, and interdependency of a Latina cosmology. Westwater’s solo portrays woman as angel, daughter, and mother, but because the dancing body slides in and out around these roles, she creates a dialogue among these archetypes which complicate and individualize her. Her literal separateness does not exclude her interactions and relationship with others but rather provides a space in which she can negotiate the frustrations, pressures, fears, pleasures, and hopes which arise through these relationships.
“Border crossing”
Jane Gabriels
Familias opens with five dance company members holding hands and traveling across the stage with a strong punctuation to their movements. There is a light in the darkness that they move towards as much as they seem wary of it, looking to each other, looking out into the darkness and again to the light. There is effort as they pull and push against and with each other- moving and then pausing, and moving again - with the empty stage also seeming to push and pull them along.
One dancer (James Adlesic) pulls the others in one and then another direction, propelling the group to follow until another dancer (Niles Ford) interrupts. The line breaks, they come back, huddled with their arms around each other’s shoulders, upper chest, and waists. They breathe together before breaking apart again. Adlesic leads, while Ford anchors the moving line to slow down their trajectory. Again, the dancers break apart, spin in circles, release and come back together again, arms slung around each other, staring out.
There is a feeling of ongoing elasticity as the dancers respond together, seeming at times out of control, or still in control but pushed beyond what is controllable, then moved into another place that whips them out and back into a pattern of being blown to find their feet again. There are stumbles, and still they hold on together. A hand slips out of an embrace and is pulled back into another. The space cannot conquer their desire to be together.
Another dancer (Patricia Dávila) moves them away from the huddle until they break and lose each other. They come together, then move away and back together until the three women lean on each other with the two men standing behind, framing their exhaustion.
Here are abstract questions and subtleties: What is a push if there is no pull? What is an elasticity of moving if there are no points in tension? What is leaving if you cannot go? There is a pull towards the next pocket of open space at full tilt with a grasp of hands to hold and this is the same line of hands that can also push back against the group in the continuous running. What is an individual here? There are individual movements, but there is not a separation. A family of differences, holding a line intact.